Strong interest inventory software

By understanding the Basic Interest Scales, you can further comprehend why certain careers are congruent with your likes and dislikes. Below you will find a list with concise explanations of all of the Basic Interest Scales BIS that your Strong Interest Inventory is based, and information relating to what type of person aligns with each scale:.

Each of these Basic Interest Scales falls into a specific Theme, which we will go into greater detail along with further understanding of each scale in the coming weeks. Through learning about these Basic Interest Scales and how they influence your Strong Interest Inventory results, you can tailor your academic years and your career path to fit with your overarching interests, ensuring that the career you choose is one that will bring you happiness in the coming years.

Look for our continued Strong Interest Inventory Based Blogs, which will be posted every week, covering important items including the explanations of the different sections of the inventory and your results. Plan your future career, based on your interests and preferences, leading you down the path to a successful work and personal life with the report below:.

Delve deeper into what your interests, hobbies, favorite topics, and locations can mean for your career and personal life with the help of the extensive and personalized Strong profile below:.

Strong Interest Inventory Blog Posts. This also can involve dealing with computer programming, working with different software, or other electronic management systems.

Those that prefer the Conventional theme value activities that require organization, detail, and accuracy. This is a direct contrast to those that prefer the Artistic theme, who value unstructured and creative tasks. Similar to those preferring Enterprising, they work well in large organizations, but differ in that they prefer to work with ideas and data over people-oriented occupations.

At work, those who score highly in the Conventional theme often enjoy analyzing financial data, developing office protocols, keeping detailed accounts of all money spent, structuring data in an easy-to-read format, writing computer software, and projecting financial trends.

They are adept at organizing, solving mathematical problems, dealing with functional computer operations, and seeking out details. They are methodical, controlled and careful with their belongings and finances. As far as their work environments go, those who score highly in the Conventional theme enjoy working in office settings for larger corporations or institutions that handle money, such as banks, accounting firms, or credit companies.

They prefer that their work hierarchy be very well defined and structured as well. Occupational Scales are most beneficial for those who are trying to decide what educational path to take for their career, whether or not they should change their career, or what job they should start out in, all of which are inherently connected. These scales work in a different way than both the General Occupational Themes and the Basic Interest Scales which are discussed further below.

The Occupational Scales compare your results to the results of others in a specific occupational field, keeping in mind your gender for both societal differences and occupationally related differences, although some correlations of certain occupations are quite high.

Other factors that are considered as well include ethnicity and cultural differences. First, the creators of the Strong Interest Inventory test took the results of verified mathematicians and compared them to the results of the rest of the individuals who took the assessment. This makes sense and allows individuals to see if they like or dislike similar things to people in a specific career field. It is entirely possible, and common, for you to score high on certain scales based off of your General Occupational themes and Basic Interest Scales, while also scoring low on a related Occupational Scale.

Donnay, D et al. CPP, The Basic Interest Scales were created as a means to improve the understanding of the Occupational Scales. They can also be seen as closely related to the General Occupational Themes.

In fact, they are built in a very similar method to the General Occupational Themes, with each Basic Interest Scale falling under a broader category related to a General Occupational Theme. The scale categories are more focused than the General Occupational Themes, but less than the Occupational Scales. In addition, the Protective Services scale includes professions that have their own, more specific Occupational Scales such as Military Enlisted and Law Enforcement Officer.

Scaling from broadest to most narrow focus, we would have Realistic Theme, then Protective Services Basic Interest Scale, and finally Law Enforcement Officer as the narrowest and most specific scale. The Investigative Theme is divided into four Basic Interest Scales, including Science for those who work best with logic and show an interest in the natural and physical sciences , Research for those who enjoy the act of formulating and conducting studies to establish patterns and uncover facts , Medical Science for those who not only hold an interest in the physical sciences, but also enjoy helping others with their skills and Mathematics for those who prefer numbers and statistical analyses.

The Basic Interest Scales can help a career professional and their clients understand the underlying interests measured by the General Occupational themes. Optimally, a trained Interpreter can cross reference all three scales to see what career fields simultaneously score high in the appropriate General Occupational Themes, Occupational Scales, and Basic Interest Scales.

The results that match all three criteria are excellent starting points for career exploration and have the highest chances of being an appropriate match for the individual taking the assessment. Based on the example in the previous paragraph, an individual that scored high in Realistic, Protective Services, and Law Enforcement Officer would be a strong candidate to explore a career in Law Enforcement.

The most recent additions to The Strong, first added in the Edition, work to complement the other traditional scales and measure preferences for more specific aspects of the work itself. One of the main purposes of the. Personal Style Scales is to help individuals explore how they prefer to go about:. These scales are applicable toward individual working styles and atmospheres, as well as the way in which you best take in and process information, both outside of the workplace and during your career.

The broad impact of these scales makes them applicable for the individual in all areas of life, meaning that learning about them is that much more important. Similarly, these scales can help people understand how their way of working may differ from their coworkers, and how each person can adjust to make the most of their productivity and adjust their work settings accordingly.

These scales are built similarly to the General Occupational Themes and Basic Interest Scales, but they do have one important unique feature. Unlike the other scales, the Personal Style Scales are created as bipolar scales with a unique middle range; therefore, you can have three distinct results per scale. These scores range from a low score dictating one preference, a higher score dictating a second polarizing preference, or a mid-range score that denotes a flexible use of both preferences that changes depending on the situation at hand.

It separates individuals that prefer to work with people from those that prefer to work with ideas, data, and things. The mid-range represents individuals that can be comfortable with people under certain circumstances, but are also comfortable working alone with data when appropriate. Individuals that prefer to work with people can be found taking jobs like but not limited to:. Individuals that are more interested in working with data and ideas are more likely to take a job like but not limited to:.

The second scale is called the Learning Environment Scale. This scale separates people who prefer to learn in a practical environment from those that prefer a more academic environment. Individuals that prefer a practical environment are more comfortable with trade or technical schools, as well as positions with on-the-job training that last a limited duration.

Individuals that favor an academic learning environment are more likely to spend more time in a traditional research-based university environment. These same individuals are also more likely to pursue teaching positions or advanced schooling at the Masters and PhD level, as well as hold interests in various cultural, verbal and research areas.

The mid-range represents a balanced approach to learning. Individuals in the mid-range will prefer to learn certain skill sets in a practical setting, while utilizing the academic approach when it best suits their needs.

Unlike the Work Style scale, the Learning Environment scale does not see one gender leaning toward a certain pole. Those who prefer practical learning are more likely to choose a job like but not limited to:. The individuals who find themselves on the academic pole of this scale are often involved in college majors in the areas of accounting or finance, business, engineering or computer technology.

Those leaning toward this pole are often associated with careers that involve practical training, such as hands-on workshops. Individuals that prefer academic learning are more likely to pick a job like but not limited to:. Those who score more highly toward the academic pole of the Learning Style scale are usually those who enjoy the study of subjects such as culture, art, linguistics, research, language, literature, history, journalism, physical sciences and social sciences.

Usually, these individuals go into occupations that require them to have a substantial amount of academic preparation or experience, whether that includes an advanced degree or several different courses of study.

The third scale is called the Leadership Style Scale. On one end, you have individuals that like taking leadership roles and thrive in environments where they can influence others , focusing more on the interpersonal dynamics between people in the workplace and how to use them to the highest advantage. They would much prefer doing tasks by themselves rather than have to teach someone else how to do it for them.

This style scale is beneficial not only in directing individuals towards what type of occupations they may enjoy, but it also helps them to understand what part of the work-place hierarchy they would perform best in, allowing them to jump into potential leadership roles or choosing to stay away from these jobs. Those who score highly in this Personal Style Scale are also more interested in making their own contributions to their project or occupation rather than collaborate with others or try to act as a mentor to their peers.

Individuals that prefer to put themselves into a more directive role are more likely to enjoy a job like but not limited to:.

They are also likely to work in areas such as journalism, social sciences, law and marketing. The fourth scale is the Risk Taking Scale. Reintegration —The Strong assessment helps individuals re-enter the workplace after a period of disconnection or absence.

Get Strong certified. Common career paths for the Social theme include:. Registered nurse. Social worker. Physical therapist. Speech pathologist. Individuals who have Enterprising-favoring results tend to be competitive, influential, ambitious, risk-takers and natural leaders. Individuals who score highly in this theme are typically energetic, confident, organized and optimistic. The Enterprising group usually prefers positions that involve managing or persuading others and tend to be happy in work environments like large corporations, financial institutions and government agencies.

Common career paths for the Enterprising theme include:. Sales manager. Marketing manager. Investment specialist. Travel consultant.